Agilent Technologies LSCA - Our measure is your success
clear
white
clear
white
clear

ePharmaceutical Analysis Issue 8 

white
clear clear clear clear clear

grey1
Literature Library
Technical Support
Education & Events

grey1
Invite a friend - If you find this valuable, share it with a friend

Instant Spreadsheet Compliance with Cerity ECM

Make Your Work Count: The Latest in Compliant Calculations

Agilent ChemStation Plus User Meetings Share Tips and Tricks

Double Your Productivity with Innovative Source for Simultaneous ESI/APCI

More Samples in Less Time

Streamline Laboratory Maintenance, Compliance, and Repair Services across Your Entire Lab

Four New Services to Help You Comply with Confidence

Ask the Experts
Ask the Experts

Need the best possible performance from your instruments, columns, systems, and software? Agilent experts have years of experience in pharmaceutical analysis and are happy to share their insights. "Ask the Experts" offers practical information to make your job easier. Learn how to choose the best pharmaceutical solution for your application, optimize methods or troubleshoot problems. Have a technical question? Contact us to learn more.


How Do I Minimize Carryover in Headspace Analysis of Residual Solvents?

Pharmaceutical manufacturers must ensure that residual solvents are below regulated levels in pharmaceutical formulations. One common way to confirm the level is headspace analysis in combination with gas chromatography (GC) with a DB-624 column. A potential problem in headspace analysis of residual solvents is sample carryover. This can occur because many of the common solvents used in pharmaceutical manufacturing lack water solubility, so you must extract them in organic solvents such as N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), DMF, pyridine, or 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI). These are high-boiling solvents that have the potential to remain in the headspace sampler pathway from one analysis to the next. Fortunately, there are ways to minimize this carryover.

Inert sample pathway

One mechanism for carryover is adsorption or reaction of sample components with the materials in the sample pathway. This is a common problem, particularly with older systems. To minimize carryover, choose a headspace system with a nonreactive, nonadsorptive sample flow path. An example is the Agilent Network Headspace Sampler coupled with an Agilent 6890N GC with inert volatiles interface and a 5973 inert MSD. This entire system is engineered to prevent sample adsorption. The sampler itself is fabricated with a Siltek sample path. The sample path tubing, sampling needle, transfer line, and purge lines are all deactivated. Figure 1 shows a residual solvent analysis using this system, and Table 1 lists the analytes in the chromatogram.


Figure 1. Total ion chromatogram of residual solvents analyzed with Agilent 6890N/5973 inert system.

Table 1. Residual solvents by peak number.


High-temperature zones

A second mechanism for carryover is condensation of sample along the sample pathway. This typically happens when the pathway is not heated uniformly, or is just not hot enough. Again, it is important to choose a headspace analyzer such as the Agilent system that has been designed and tested for thermal uniformity and high temperature operation. Second, it is important to set temperatures high enough to avoid condensation, and to analyze blanks to confirm suitable settings. For example, carryover tests were performed on the Agilent system with alternate vials of water and pure DMI, a solvent that boils at 225 ºC. When the headspace oven was equilibrated at 220 ºC, and the sample loop and transfer line were kept at 250 ºC, the DMI carryover into the water blanks was very low-under 0.003 percent.

Programmed vent purge

A third source of carryover is residual sample in the headspace sampling loop. To avoid this, the sampling loop should be purged after the sample has been transferred to the GC. The G1888 Network Headspace Sampler has a unique programmable vent line purge capability that allows you to set a purge time from 30 seconds up to a maximum of the analysis cycle time. Studies have shown that a 20-minute purge time works well to prevent this source of carryover.

Conclusion

For the analysis of residual solvents in pharmaceutical formulations, sample carryover is minimized with an inert sample pathway, uniform high-temperature heated zones, and a programmable vent purge.

Get ahead!

For instrument settings for residual solvent analysis, as well as details on preventing carryover, download an application note (5989-1263EN). By Roger L. Firor
Agilent Technologies senior applications chemist


...................................................

Need technical or sales assistance? Have a technical question?
Click here to find worldwide sales and support, online technical support or e-mail assistance. Submit your question online, directly to our experts. We will respond promptly.


HomeSubscribeAsk the ExpertsEvents CalendarContact UsInvite a Friend — If you enjoy this information, share it with a friend.
 
 
grey1
related_bottom_left clear clear clear
clear
grey2
Please select your country:
 
   
Registration   |  Login Benefits of Registration