YIELD CORRELATIONS BETWEEN TWO EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
Crude Oil Assay Distillation Versus HTSD
By Dan Villalanti and Joe Raia,
Triton Analytics Corporation;
Jim Maynard and Aaron Arias,
Shell Development Company
To compare the laboratory techniques of Crude Assay
Distillation to High-Temperature Simulated Distillation (HTSD),
we analyzed approximately 85 crude oils using both techniques.
The crudes had varying pitch, sulfur, nickel, vanadium,
Conradson carbon, and asphaltene content. Our study demonstrated
that HTSD offers tighter precision than conventional crude assay
distillation.
The ability to evaluate the variability of crude distillation
yield curves rapidly and accurately has increasingly important
economic considerations in refining margins -- especially with
heavier crude oil, which produces larger quantities of low-value
heavy residue. As the average gravity of crudes continues to decrease,
the need to characterize heavier crude oil increases. In the past,
refiners have had to rely on Crude Assay Distillation methods ASTM D
2892 and D 5236 for the characterization, but advances in gas
chromatography techniques now allow these methods to be replaced by
HTSD.
Figure 1. Assay and HTSD yields; light crude, API gravity 50.4
Figure 2. Assay and HTSD yields; intermediate crude, API gravity 24.2
Figure 3. Assay and HTSD yields; heavy crude, API gravity 9.7
Crude Assay Distillation
Crude Assay Distillation (ASTM D 2892) uses a 15-plate column
operating under a reflux ratio of 5:1 to produce true boiling point
(TBP) data. The method applies only to crude oil. Generally, the
distillation starts at ambient pressure (760 mm Hg), and then
switches to vacuum conditions to extend the method to 650°F
atmospheric equivalent boiling point (AEBP). The remaining charge
is transferred to a vacuum potstill method (ASTM D 5236) in which the
distillation continues at 0.5 mm Hg to obtain an AEBP limit of 1000 to
1050°F.
High-Temperature Simulated Distillation
Basically, HTSD is an extension of ASTM Method D 2887, which
produces the boiling range distribution of hydrocarbons by gas
chromatography. The analysis is calibrated by correlating the C5
to C120 n-paraffins elution time to their AEBP. HTSD determines
the true boiling point distribution of petroleum products up to
a final boiling point (FBP) of 1382°F or 750°C. A key
difference between HTSD and D 2887 is the ability of HTSD to
analyze residue-containing samples, which makes it useful in
monitoring and controlling the processes shown in Table 1.
To allow a meaningful comparison of the yield curves in our
study, the crudes we analyzed were grouped into light, intermediate,
and heavy categories, according to their API gravities (Table 2).
The yield curves, expressed in % weight, were compared at 10
distillation cutpoints. Figures 1, 2, and 3 show the yield curves
obtained for three typical crudes. This comparison shows good
overall agreement between the two methods.
Figure 4. HTSD assay; weight % difference at each cut point
Figure 4 contains the average difference for all the crudes
in each of the three API categories obtained by D 2892/D 5236 and
HTSD. In general, the difference observed at each cutpoint is less
than ±2 % weight. The estimated precision of the correlation
between crude assay distillation and HTSD yield at each cutpoint
results in standard deviations of < 2 % weight. The precision
of HTSD cutpoints up to 1000°F is better than 0.5 % weight.
An exception occurs at the 750°F cutpoint for light and
intermediate crudes and the region from 750 to 900°F for
heavy crudes. The 750°F cutpoint is the first cutpoint following
the crossover from ASTM D 2892 (TBP 15-plate) to D 5236
(vacuum potstill, 1-plate) conditions. This change in distillation
conditions likely contributes most of the difference when compared to
HTSD, which has no pressure-related crossover effects.
A Dedicated SIMDIS Analyzer
AC Analytical Controls' High Temp SIMDIS Analyzer determines
the boiling-point distribution of petroleum streams with a final
boiling point up to 1382°F (750°C). One use of the AC analyzer
is in a crude assay to predict the quality and yield for
the various petroleum fractions. Other applications determine the
boiling-point ranges of vacuum gas oil, lube oil base stock, FCC feed,
fuel, and gas oil.
Table 1. HTSD analysis range
Table 2. Grouping of crudes by API gravity
Based on the Hewlett-Packard HP 6890 Series gas chromatograph, this
system offers a high level of automation that simplifies the analyses,
decreases analysis time, and minimizes operator involvement. Ease of use
is an integral feature of the AC High Temp SIMDIS Analyzer.
SIMDIS Replaces
Crude Assay Distillation Refiners need improved accuracy and
precision of boiling-point data to optimize overall refining margins.
From the results of our crude assay study, we concluded that HTSD
offers tighter precision than conventional crude assay distillation
(ASTM D 2892 and D 5236). It also provides faster turnaround and
boiling-point data to a much higher final boiling point (1382°F).
HTSD is a valuable business tool for evaluating new crudes and ensuring
crude product integrity during transportation and delivery.
To get in touch with AC Analytical Controls, Inc.: North
America -- Telephone: +1-215-638-7078; Fax: +1-215-638-7096;
E-mail: acinc@analytical-controls.com.
Other parts of the world -- Telephone: +31-10-4624811; Fax: +31-10-4626330; E-mail:
acbv@analytical-controls.com. Internet
www.analytical-controls.com
References
Villalanti, D.C., et.al. Yield Correlations Between Crude Assay
Distillation and High Temperature Simulated Distillation (HTSD).
Report prepared for the AIChE 1997 Spring National Meeting, Houston,
TX, March 9 - 13, 1997.
Villalanti, D.C., Janson, D., and Colle, P. Hydrocarbon
Characterization by High Temperature Simulated Distillation
(HTDS). Report prepared for Session 4b at the AIChE 1995 Spring
National Meeting, Houston, TX, March 19 - 23, 1995.
Golden, S.W., Villalanti, D.C., and Martin, G.R. Feed
Characterization and Deepcut Vacuum Columns: Simulation and
Design, Impact of High Temperature Simulated Distillation.
Report prepared for Session 47a at the AIChE 1994 Spring
National Meeting. Atlanta, GA, April 18 - 20, 1994.
Golden, S.W., Craft, S., and Villalanti, D.C. Refinery
Analytical Techniques Optimize Unit Performance. Hydrocarbon
Processing, November 1995.
|