Detecting Mercury in Fish Tissue


Detecting Mercury in Fish Tissue

Using Aqueous-Phase Ethylation with GC/AED

by Hilton B. Swan, Australian Government Analytical Laboratory, Hobart, Tasmania (Australia)

The National Food Authority in Australia has recommended that the National Food Standards Council adopt a national maximum permitted concentration (MPC) of a mean 0.5 mg/kg of mercury in fish and fish products. An exceptional MPC of 1.0 mg/kg is recommended for products from all shark and ray species, orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), gemfish (Rexea solandri), billfish (Xiphiidae sp. and Istiophoridae sp.), barramundi (Lates calcarifer), and southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyi).

We used an HP 5921A atomic emission detector coupled to an HP 5890 Series II gas chromatograph to determine the concentration and speciation of mercury in various fish species caught and processed locally. The AED was found to be a sensitive detector highly specific to the atomic emission wavelength of 253.652 nanometers for mercury. Using this wavelength, it is possible to detect Hg down to 0.1 pg/sec peak width with the GC/AED. The specificity relative to carbon can be as high as 100,000:1.

For fish tissue, it was possible to determine Hg down to about 1 µg/kg wet weight. An application of GC/ AED for the determination of organomercurials using the 184.950 nm emission wavelength has been reported (Carro-Diaz et al., 1994).

Converting Mercury Species

The speciation of Hg (II) present in fish tissue was determined by the reaction with sodium tetraethyl borate (STEB) in aqueous solution (Yong & Bayona, 1995 and Rapsomanikis & Craig, 1991), where ionic mercury species are converted to their volatile ethyl derivatives. Labile CH3HgX species react to form methylethyl mercury, and labile HgX2 species form diethyl mercury. Nonionic forms such as dimethyl mercury and elemental mercury do not react with the tetraethyl borate anion, which makes it possible to determine the various forms of mercury by GC separation.

A typical GC/AED chromatogram of an ethylated fish sample is shown in Figure 1. This sample has a relatively low total Hg concentration of 0.05 mg/kg. Methyl mercury is the major form of mercury present in fish. Upon ethylation with the tetraethyl borate anion, it reacts to form methylethyl mercury.

Preparing the Sample

In the technique we used, the fish tissue is digested in a solution of KOH/methanol. A small portion of this digest is added to an aqueous solution in which it is reacted with STEB. The derivatized volatile mercury species are then purged from solution onto a graphitic carbon trap (Bloom, 1989). This trap is thermally desorbed of the mercury species to a cryogenic trap, which is subsequently warmed to release the sample for GC separation.

Figure 2 shows the configuration of the valving and cryotrap system used for the analysis of organic mercury compounds. Actuation of the 8­port valve provides a standard loop volume of dimethyl mercury to be sent to the cryotrap. Actuation of the 6­port valve, followed by warming of the trap, will release the collected sample to the GC/AED.

Complementary Standards

Standardization is achieved by a number of means. Derivatization of a methyl mercuric chloride solution with STEB will provide an external standard. A certified dimethyl mercury permeation device also provides a useful standard, which can be used as an internal standard for the analysis, because dimethyl mercury is generally a minor organomercurial or most commonly not found in fish. Comparison of the total mercury present in fish tissue by cold­vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy is also used as a means of standardization.

Confirmation of the elemental identity of a compound with the AED can be made using the "snapshot" feature of the software, which displays spectra obtained over the wavelength range of the diode array. A background-subtracted "snapshot" of dimethyl mercury at an RT of 6.130 minutes (Figure 3) shows the Hg emission wavelength of 253.652 nm of this compound. A mixed mercury compounds standard analyzed by GC/AED is shown in the chromatogram of Figure 4.

References

  1. Carro-Diaz, A. M. Lorenzo-Ferreira, R. A., and Cela-Torrijos. Speciation of Organomercurials in Biological and Environmental Samples by Gas Chromatography with Microwave-Induced Plasma Atomic Emission Detection. J. Chromatography A, 683, 245-252 (1994).
  2. Yong, C. and Bayona, J. M. Determination of Methylmercury in Fish and River Water Samples Using in situ Sodium Tetraethylborate Derivatization Followed by Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatography A 696, 113-122 (1995).
  3. Rapsomanikis, S. and Craig, P. J. Speciation of Mercury and Methylmercury Compounds in Aqueous Samples by Chromatography-Atomic Absorption Spectrometry After Ethylation with Sodium Tetraethylborate. Analytica Chimica Acta 248, 563-567 (1991).
  4. Bloom, N. Determination of Picogram Levels of Methylmercury by Aqueous Phase Ethylation Followed by Cryogenic Gas Chromatography with Cold Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Detection. Canadian J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci. 46, 131-1140 (1989).