Fast and Precise


Automated Gasoline Characterization: Fast and Precise

AC PIONA Analyzer Eliminates Operator Variation

by Dr. R. E. Snelling, Phillips Research Center, Bartlesville, OK (U.S.A.)

The U.S. 1990 Clean Air Act requires every refinery or terminal producing gasoline, either by blending or refining, to estimate the environmental quality parameters of its gasoline. These parameters include distillation, olefins, aromatics, sulfur, benzene, RVP, and oxygen content and are considered the baseline.

The purpose of the baseline is to keep refiners from shifting undesirable components removed in the reformulation process into conventional gasoline. The quality of all gasoline produced in the future will be compared to the baseline to determine whether the gasoline meets Federal standards. Knowledge of gasoline composition is important for monitoring processes and verifying regulatory compliance.

Manual FIA: Potential Sources for Error

One method used to determine hydrocarbon types is manual fluorescent indicator adsorption, or FIA (ASTM D-1319). This method separates hydrocarbon samples using a special glass adsorption column packed with activated silica gel. Alcohol promotes the migration of the sample down the column. The FIA method identifies saturates, nonaromatic olefins, and aromatics up to 315°C.

A number of potential sources of error exist with FIA. When the different hydrocarbon types separate, the zone boundaries are often not sharp, and the hydrocarbon types interfere, which leads to errors in interpreting the data. Human error is a factor, because the determination of aromatics, olefins, and saturates is visual. Improper packing of the silica gel or incomplete elution of hydrocarbons by the alcohols also leads to erroneous results. Samples containing light hydrocarbons require depentanization, which loses C6 paraffins and leads to inaccuracies (Kosai et al, 1990).

FIA Versus Automated PIONA Method

In our study, we compared the results of FIA with an automated method for performing FIA gasoline characterization using an AC Analytical Controls PIONA analyzer. The AC PIONA analyzer is a multidimensional gas-chromatographic system that combines four separation columns and two compound-specific traps. The system consists of a modified HP 5890 gas chromatograph interfaced to an HP ChemStation. Dedicated AC software controls all the events within the system and performs all data calculations and reporting.

We used 18 standards obtained from the U.S. Air Quality Improvement Research Program (AQIRP) and containing varying amounts of C5.

Comparing Correlation Coefficients

Results calculated from AC PIONA analyses are more precise, accurate and free of most operator variation. The figures show the true composition of the AQIRP standards plotted against the results found by FIA and AC PIONA analyses for aromatics and olefins.

In comparing the AC PIONA results versus the true composition, the correlation coefficients (R²) calculated for saturates and aromatics are greater than 0.99. The correlation coefficient for olefins indicates more scatter, but still yields a 92% probability of a linear relationship. The correlation coefficients calculated using the FIA method are lower; the R² for saturates is 0.96, for aromatics 0.97, and for olefins 0.74.

It is important to show how closely the AC PIONA results match the ASTM procedure. In comparing the AC PIONA results versus the FIA results, the correlation coefficients show good agreement. The correlation coefficient for saturates is 0.98, for aromatics 0.96, and for olefins 0.83.

Complete Picture With One Injection

The AC PIONA analyzer offers a viable method for performing FIA analysis of gasoline-range materials. Data from AC PIONA analyses are accurate and free of most operator variation. The automated operation of the AC PIONA makes it applicable for screening large numbers of gasoline samples - an advantage when compared to the labor-intensive manual FIA method.

The AC PIONA provides fast, precise hydrocarbon-typing for each carbon number up to C11. In one injection, an analyst gets a complete picture of a complicated mixture. The results of replicate analyses agree within 1% absolute for quantitating the structural types in a sample. The instrument proves useful for monitoring relative changes in processes and streams and offers manpower savings and improved accuracy.